Problem with smb shares.

[Felipe Alfaro Solana]

On 8 Feb 2005, at 19:13, akonstam at trinity.edu wrote:

> I know someone is going to tell me that google will give me the answer
> but I am burdened with too much information already so I will ask this
> anyway.
>
> Since W2k shares can have more than two levels but evidently not in
> the smbmount that I am using so I can say:
> smbmount //trinity-tiger/users .....
> but not:
> smbmount //trinity-tigers/users/csldap1 ...

What's the problem with the first command? Why do you want to mount a 
subdirectory of a share instead of mounting the share directly?