Mounting a USB Web Camera

[Jeff Vian]

On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 00:08 +0000, Laurence wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 17:55 -0600, Jeff Vian wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 18:33 +0000, Laurence wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 18:15 +0000, Laurence wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 00:40 -0500, Johnathan Bailes wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 23:40:32 -0500, Chet Ranaweera
> > > > > <ckranaweera at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > 
> > snip
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > Don't think it quite works that was for a WEB cam!
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Not replying to my own message.. Please use 'reply to all' to get
> > > responses onto the list.
> > > 
> > 
> > "Reply to all" usually (at least for me) sends a message to the
> > originator as well as to the list.  Please just do a "reply" to get to
> > the list.  Check the TO line in your reply email to see that.
> 
> I find on a number of messages "reply" only gets the sender not the
> list!
> 
Then your mailer seems not to be using the "Reply-To:" header in the
mail, but rather the "From:" header. It even ignores the "Sender:"
header.

In this mail those headers were:
	From: Laurence <Laurence.Orchard at tesco.net>
	Reply-To: laurence at orchards.org.uk, For users of Fedora Core releases
<fedora-list at redhat.com>
	Sender: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com

A simple reply on this one WILL send the message to both addresses in
the Reply-To header from my mailer (Evolution 2.0.2)

> > 
> > A "rely to all" message for list subscribers will often result in 2
> > copies being received since one is from the list and one from the person
> > replying.  This is usually unnecessary and often aggravating to the
> > recipient.
> > 
> 
> I would say this is better than not getting a reply onto the list at all
> 

That is true, but not needed for the majority of mail clients.

> > I find that _*SOME*_ messages on the list seem to have the "Reply-To:
> > set to include both the list address and the senders address while
> > others only have the list address in the Reply-T0:  header. On those
> > messages a reply will go to both addresses unless you carefully remove
> > the extra address.
> >