Thats not the correct Fedora Core CDROM.

[Dave Pisarek]

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:20:58 -0600, Jeff Vian <jvian10 at charter.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 12:12 -0600, Bill Gradwohl wrote:
> > Dave Pisarek wrote:
> >
> > >This is what I am receiving when installing FC3 on a Compaq Deskpro.
> > >It occurs when I am asked to insert disk 2. I am verified the checksum
> > >and also reburned cd2 at a slower speed. Does anyone have any ideas
> > >and can it actually have been cd1 like in this thread:
> > >
> > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=134088
> > >
> > >--Dave
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > According to the md5sum file I downloaded several months ago, the
> > following are the checksums for the FC3 cd's:
> > db8c7254beeb4f6b891d1ed3f689b412  FC3-i386-disc1.iso
> > 2c11674cf429fe570445afd9d5ff564e  FC3-i386-disc2.iso
> > f88f6ab5947ca41f3cf31db04487279b  FC3-i386-disc3.iso
> > 6331c00aa3e8c088cc365eeb7ef230ea  FC3-i386-disc4.iso
> >
> > The one mentioned in the URL is not amongst these.
> >
> Yeah, the FC3T2 CD had a different checksum than the release CD.
> 
> Dave,
> Try the checksum of all 4 CDs and the images to see if they match the
> official checksums.  It may be disk 1, it may be disk 2.
> Some people had problems with disk1 especially when burning at default
> speed but they worked when burned at 2X or 4X
> 
> > --
> > Bill Gradwohl
> > bill at ycc.com
> > http://www.ycc.com
> > spamSTOMPER Protected email
> >
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 
Actually the checksums were correct as according to the release
checksum. It was a bad burn on disk 1. I was able to get it installed
with no issues there after but now need to deal with a POS video card
that is causing display issues but that is for a different thread.

Thanks all,

-Dave