Re Media Kit for fedora
Aakash Munjal
aakash at almoayedgroup.com
Thu Feb 24 15:00:28 UTC 2005
Thanks a lot for such a prompt response.
Now as far as download is concerned, can i download the software to my
windows 2000 professional machine and then use the files to install
fedora.
If not then which is the minimum version of linux i must have to download
fedora.
best regards,
Aakash Munjal
> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
> fedora-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed (Alexander Spanke)
> 2. Re: kernel sources (Jeff Vian)
> 3. RE: A few quick newbie questions... (Erik Hemdal)
> 4. Re: new to list (Mark Haney)
> 5. Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed (A. Lanza)
> 6. Re: Fedora 3 DNS configuration (David Cary Hart)
> 7. Slightly OT - FC4T1 (Mark Haney)
> 8. Re: kernel sources (David Cary Hart)
> 9. Re: Slightly OT - FC4T1 (Paul Howarth)
> 10. Re: Slightly OT - FC4T1 (Mark Haney)
> 11. Fedora 2 core and Zebra As a FC2 Router box Help (Eric)
> 12. Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed (Jeff Vian)
> 13. Re: Distributed file system (Matthew Miller)
> 14. Re: a stupid question about rpmbuild in fc3 (Giulio Sorrentino)
> 15. GFS and Fedora (Giulio Sorrentino)
> 16. Re: GFS and Fedora (Daniel Ch?nard)
> 17. desktop icons take 10 mins to appear after login (Eliot Stock)
> 18. Re: new to list (Giulio Sorrentino)
> 19. Re: GFS and Fedora (Rahul Sundaram)
> 20. Re: desktop icons take 10 mins to appear after login
> (Rahul Sundaram)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:15:50 +0100
> From: Alexander Spanke <aspanke at hpce.nec.com>
> Subject: Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed
> To: Fedora List <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109250951.2676.56.camel at riker>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Hi,
>
> on what kind of fs do you create this image ?
>
> Cheers
> Alex
>
> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 14:12 +0100, A. Lanza wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> i'm trying to burn a DVD using k3b, as i usually do for CD burning. I'm
>> using 4,7GB size DVD-R. The problem is that i cannot burn a 4,4GB. file.
>> The file is exactly 4,613,704,668 bytes long.
>>
>> The message i get from k3b is the following:
>> /usr/bin/mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type
>> and then
>> File <file> is too large - ignoring
>>
>> It seems like the problem is the file size, but that file should fit in
>> a DVD, shouldn't it? Is there any limit in the size of files written to
>> DVD?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alf
>>
>>
> --
> =======================================================
> Alexander Spanke System Analyst
> NEC High Performance Computing Europe GmbH
> Prinzenallee 11 D-40549 Duesseldorf, Germany
> Tel: +49 211 5369 146 aspanke at hpce.nec.com
> Fax: +49 211 5369 199 http://www.hpce.nec.com
> =======================================================
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:20:23 -0600
> From: Jeff Vian <jvian10 at charter.net>
> Subject: Re: kernel sources
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109251224.10707.68.camel at goliath.lab.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 23:03 -0500, H. Crissman wrote:
>> I can't find the kernel-sources rpm for kernel 2.6-9 or 2.6-10? Am I
>> missing
>> something? I am looking for them on the yum repos.
>>
>> H. Crissman
>>
> Look in the source SRPMS repo
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:20:43 -0500
> From: "Erik Hemdal" <ehemdal at townisp.com>
> Subject: RE: A few quick newbie questions...
> To: <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20050224132046.B451729952 at ns1.townisp.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>> Using a 200GIG WD harddrive and VIA EPIA M10000 mini-ITX
>> motherboard with 512 megs of RAM....
>>
>> #1 - I do the install, no problems as far as I can tell, then
>> it has to do a reboot. It gets to where it is then asking
>> for a "username" in the middle of the screen. I don't have a
>> username. At some point during the install it forces me to
>> put in an admin name or something, but that user/pass doesn't
>
> Yes you do. At a minimum, you have a username 'root'. The password is
> that
> which you established for the administrator during installation. You
> should
> also set up a separate "user's" account and use that account for your
> everyday work.
>
>> work. Is there a way during the install to tell it "hey, no
>> freaking user/pass on this computer"?
>
> No. Linux is a true multiuser and multitasking OS. Having specific
> usernames and passwords allows you to have better control over your system
> and makes it more secure. The tiny inconvenience of logging in is worth
> the
> benefit.
>
> I can think of one way in which you could avoid usernames and passwords
> (there may be others) but this is extra work to make the system easier to
> break. Set up users, and save yourself grief.
>
> Log in as user root, with the password you set, and run
>
> system-config-users
>
> at a shell prompt (System Settings > Users and Groups on the menu) to set
> up
> an ordinary user's account.
>>
>> #2 - Want to do a dual boot between XP and Linux. Do I
>> partition the harddrive first, then install XP, then install Linux?
>
> That is what I would do to create a dual-boot system. If you are working
> on
> a system which currently contains XP, reduce the size of your NTFS
> partition
> to make space for Fedora. Do not alter the small FAT partition which XP
> has
> created (XP needs a FAT partition to work). Leave the freed up space
> unpartitioned. Anaconda will handle formatting for you when you choose to
> install in unpartitioned space.
>
> Hope this helps. Erik
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:22:18 -0500
> From: Mark Haney <markh at uptimecomputer.net>
> Subject: Re: new to list
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109251338.6468.11.camel at fedora.uptimecomputer.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 16:13 +0300, Aakash wrote:
>> hi all,
>
> Welcome. Always glad to see new people on the list.
>>
>> I am a new member of the group and first thing that i would like to
>> know is how to get the software.
>
> Best way to get it is to download it:
>
> http://fedora.redhat.com/download/
>
> this is a good place to start.
>
>
>> How can i get the media kit for fedora project?
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Aakash Munjal
>>
>> --
>> fedora-list mailing list
>> fedora-list at redhat.com
>> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
> --------------------------------------
> Mark Haney
> markh at uptimecomputer.net
> Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Kernel: 2.6.10-1.766_FC3 GNU/Linux
> 08:20:34 up 18:48, 2 users, load average: 1.06, 1.15, 0.76
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:23:47 +0100
> From: "A. Lanza" <alf at lanza-ti.com>
> Subject: Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109251427.29276.13.camel at aubrey.ayto.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> El jue, 24-02-2005 a las 14:15 +0100, Alexander Spanke escribió:
>> Hi,
>>
>> on what kind of fs do you create this image ?
>
> All my partitions are ext3.
>
>> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 14:12 +0100, A. Lanza wrote:
>> > Hi list,
>> >
>> > i'm trying to burn a DVD using k3b, as i usually do for CD burning.
>> I'm
>> > using 4,7GB size DVD-R. The problem is that i cannot burn a 4,4GB.
>> file.
>> > The file is exactly 4,613,704,668 bytes long.
>> >
>> > The message i get from k3b is the following:
>> > /usr/bin/mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type
>> > and then
>> > File <file> is too large - ignoring
>> >
>> > It seems like the problem is the file size, but that file should fit
>> in
>> > a DVD, shouldn't it? Is there any limit in the size of files written
>> to
>> > DVD?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Alf
>> >
>> >
>> --
>> =======================================================
>> Alexander Spanke System Analyst
>> NEC High Performance Computing Europe GmbH
>> Prinzenallee 11 D-40549 Duesseldorf, Germany
>> Tel: +49 211 5369 146 aspanke at hpce.nec.com
>> Fax: +49 211 5369 199 http://www.hpce.nec.com
>> =======================================================
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:26:13 -0500
> From: David Cary Hart <Fedora at TQMcube.com>
> Subject: Re: Fedora 3 DNS configuration
> To: ssalviche at hotmail.com, For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109251573.3341.3.camel at dch.TQMcube.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 13:59 +0100, Santiago (PapaOso) wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Ill try to make this quick.
>>
>> Im trying to set 8 computers in a lab room all interconnected to a
>> router. I got assigned to set mine as a DNS server, and I dont know
>> where to start. Please, any chance of guidance ?.
>>
> I assume that you are trying to create a caching name server for the
> LAN. DHCP or static LAN IPs?
>
>
> --
>
> Total Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence
> Fight Spam: http://www.tqmcube.com/rbldnsd.htm
> Daily Updates: http://www.tqmcube.com/spam_trap.htm
> rsync -l tqmcube.com::spamlists
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:28:10 -0500
> From: Mark Haney <markh at uptimecomputer.net>
> Subject: Slightly OT - FC4T1
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <1109251690.6468.14.camel at fedora.uptimecomputer.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> I know this isn't the test list, but this is more a general question.
> What's the story with the pushing back the release of FC4T1 to mid-
> March? This is more just curiousity than anything else. Does anyone
> know?
>
> --------------------------------------
> Mark Haney
> markh at uptimecomputer.net
> Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Kernel: 2.6.10-1.766_FC3 GNU/Linux
> 08:26:44 up 18:55, 2 users, load average: 0.44, 0.52, 0.58
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:28:28 -0500
> From: David Cary Hart <Fedora at TQMcube.com>
> Subject: Re: kernel sources
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109251708.3341.6.camel at dch.TQMcube.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 23:03 -0500, H. Crissman wrote:
>> I can't find the kernel-sources rpm for kernel 2.6-9 or 2.6-10? Am I
>> missing
>> something?
>
> Yes. You missed the release notes.
>
> This may then help:
> http://www.tqmcube.com/fc3_custom_kernel.htm
> --
>
> Total Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence
> Fight Spam: http://www.tqmcube.com/rbldnsd.htm
> Daily Updates: http://www.tqmcube.com/spam_trap.htm
> rsync -l tqmcube.com::spamlists
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:29:43 +0000
> From: Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org>
> Subject: Re: Slightly OT - FC4T1
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <421DD6C7.4060609 at city-fan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Mark Haney wrote:
>> I know this isn't the test list, but this is more a general question.
>> What's the story with the pushing back the release of FC4T1 to mid-
>> March? This is more just curiousity than anything else. Does anyone
>> know?
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/124798/
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:32:10 -0500
> From: Mark Haney <markh at uptimecomputer.net>
> Subject: Re: Slightly OT - FC4T1
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109251930.6468.16.camel at fedora.uptimecomputer.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 13:29 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> Mark Haney wrote:
>> > I know this isn't the test list, but this is more a general question.
>> > What's the story with the pushing back the release of FC4T1 to mid-
>> > March? This is more just curiousity than anything else. Does anyone
>> > know?
>>
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/124798/
>>
>> Paul.
>
> Perfect. Thanks for the heads up.
>>
>
> --------------------------------------
> Mark Haney
> markh at uptimecomputer.net
> Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Kernel: 2.6.10-1.766_FC3 GNU/Linux
> 08:31:57 up 19:00, 2 users, load average: 0.37, 0.65, 0.62
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:52:19 -0500
> From: Eric <emac at cybergps.net>
> Subject: Fedora 2 core and Zebra As a FC2 Router box Help
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <opsmpfhhk0u4h0jv at thinkpadbr.go.salve.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes;
> charset=iso-8859-15
>
> Hi im setting up a router box with Fedora core 2 and zebra i use a
> buisness cable modem line with 6 static ip's coming out of it i would like
> to setup 1 ip address to dhcpd a server for my LAN but also have my other
> 5 ip's routed to private ips so i can just set adapter to a private
> ip which is really a static.... So looking for info on if first do i need
> a ethernet adapter for every IP or can i call all statics from one
> wan/internet adapter... also lets say i have the static 24.249.24.2-6 with
> a gateway of 24.249.24.1 now i want to take one of those ips first
> lets say 24.249.24.2 and assign that to boxes main dhcpd server for
> private network of a range like 192.168.100.2-100 1 being gateway
> ofcourse... now i want to route the other ips's like 24.249.24.3 to
> private address like 192.168.100.101 and so on for each address can anyone
> help me with this i also know i need to use atleast 2 nics in box and i
> probally can get the dhcpd server up pretty easy im betting but just need
> to setup this up right ASAP
>
> --
> Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:06:53 -0600
> From: Jeff Vian <jvian10 at charter.net>
> Subject: Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109254013.10707.85.camel at goliath.lab.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 14:12 +0100, A. Lanza wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> i'm trying to burn a DVD using k3b, as i usually do for CD burning. I'm
>> using 4,7GB size DVD-R. The problem is that i cannot burn a 4,4GB. file.
>> The file is exactly 4,613,704,668 bytes long.
>>
>> The message i get from k3b is the following:
>> /usr/bin/mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type
>> and then
>> File <file> is too large - ignoring
>>
>> It seems like the problem is the file size, but that file should fit in
>> a DVD, shouldn't it? Is there any limit in the size of files written to
>> DVD?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alf
>>
>
> What are you telling k3b to do?
> Are you telling it to burn a data dvd, a CD, an iso image, or burn the
> iso image to dvd?
>
> a DVD is made by k3b using growisofs to do the labor, and burning that
> image to the DVD. But if you chose a CD project it will not allow it
> because of the amount of data.
>
> I create a data DVD by using { file -> new project -> new data DVD
> project } then creating the file list to be included with drag-n-drop.
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:08:00 -0500
> From: Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org>
> Subject: Re: Distributed file system
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20050224140800.GA1913 at jadzia.bu.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:57:51PM +0000, Jonathan Allen wrote:
>> I can understand how the user directories work, but how do you manage
>> the sharing of /etc/passwd, /etc/group, /etc/shadow etc ?
>
> rpm -qi nss_ldap
>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:09:32 +0100
> From: Giulio Sorrentino <numerone.fedora at wooow.it>
> Subject: Re: a stupid question about rpmbuild in fc3
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <421DE01C.1050009 at wooow.it>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> BJACE MK Raymond Xu wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I installed FC3 on my PC with a distribution of 4 CDs. But
>> after hosting that PC I found that I can't use rpmbuild or rpm -b. I
>> didn't choose to install everything. So could you tell me what else
>> package to install to use rpmbuild?
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> raynix
>
> [numerone at numeronesoft ~]$ su -c "yum whatprovides rpmbuild"
> Password:
> Searching Packages:
> Setting up Repo: base
> repomd.xml 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
> Setting up Repo: updates-released
> repomd.xml 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
> Setting up Repo: freshrpms
> repomd.xml 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
> Reading repository metadata in from local files
> base : ################################################## 2622/2622
> primary.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 290 kB 00:07
> MD Read : ################################################## 678/678
> updates-re: ################################################## 678/678
> primary.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 146 kB 00:00
> MD Read : ################################################## 477/477
> freshrpms : ################################################## 477/477
> Importing Additional filelist information for packages
> base : ################################################## 2622/2622
> filelists.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 2.7 MB 00:43
> MD Read : ################################################## 678/678
> updates-re: ################################################## 678/678
> filelists.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 225 kB 00:01
> MD Read : ################################################## 477/477
> freshrpms : ################################################## 477/477
>
>
> rpm-build.i386 4.3.2-21 base
> Matched from:
> /usr/bin/rpmbuild
> /usr/share/man/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz
> /usr/bin/rpmbuild
> name 4.1-1
>
>
> rpm-libs.i386 4.3.2-21 base
> Matched from:
> /usr/lib/librpmbuild-4.3.so
> librpmbuild-4.3.so
>
>
> rpm-devel.i386 4.3.2-21 base
> Matched from:
> /usr/include/rpm/rpmbuild.h
> /usr/lib/librpmbuild.so
> /usr/lib/librpmbuild.a
> /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/rpmbuild_8h-source.html
> /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/group__rpmbuild.html
> /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/rpmbuild_8h.html
> /usr/lib/librpmbuild.la
> /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/structrpmBuildArguments__s.html
>
>
> rpm.i386 4.3.2-21 base
> Matched from:
> /usr/share/man/pl/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz
> /usr/share/man/ja/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz
>
>
> rpm-libs.i386 4.3.2-21 installed
> Matched from:
> /usr/lib/librpmbuild-4.3.so
> librpmbuild-4.3.so
>
>
> rpm-devel.i386 4.3.2-21 installed
> Matched from:
> /usr/include/rpm/rpmbuild.h
> /usr/lib/librpmbuild.a
> /usr/lib/librpmbuild.la
> /usr/lib/librpmbuild.so
> /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/group__rpmbuild.html
> /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/rpmbuild_8h-source.html
> /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/rpmbuild_8h.html
> /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/structrpmBuildArguments__s.html
>
>
> rpm-build.i386 4.3.2-21 installed
> Matched from:
> /usr/bin/rpmbuild
> /usr/share/man/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz
> rpmbuild(VendorConfig)
>
>
> rpm.i386 4.3.2-21 installed
> Matched from:
> /usr/share/man/ja/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz
> /usr/share/man/pl/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz
> [numerone at numeronesoft ~]$
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:11:03 +0100
> From: Giulio Sorrentino <numerone.fedora at wooow.it>
> Subject: GFS and Fedora
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <421DE077.8070209 at wooow.it>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
>
> Which could be advantages for home users using that filesystem?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:15:36 -0500
> From: Daniel Ch?nard <dchenard at infoteck.qc.ca>
> Subject: Re: GFS and Fedora
> To: Fedora <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109254537.5876.51.camel at pclinux.infoteck.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I dont think it's for end/home user...
>
> It's more for Enterprise with more Filesystem server. This is for a
> failover / High availability server / clustering filesystem
>
> Le jeudi 24 février 2005 à 15:11 +0100, Giulio Sorrentino a écrit :
>> Which could be advantages for home users using that filesystem?
>>
> --
> Daniel Chénard
> SysAdmin Unix
> Infoteck Internet
> 5480, Boul. Jean XXIII
> Trois-Rivières-Ouest, Québec
> Canada
> G8Z 4A9
> Tel: 819-370-3232
> Sans Frais: 1-866-853-3232
> Fax: 819-370-3624
>
> PS: The Light at the End of The Tunnel
> will be turned off until further
> notice due to budget cutbacks.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:17:11 +0000
> From: Eliot Stock <fedora_list at eliotstock.com>
> Subject: desktop icons take 10 mins to appear after login
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <20050224141711.9trlvzs8gogs8okw at eliotstock.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Afternoon everyone.
>
> Something funny is up with nautilus on my FC3 box.
>
> When I log in the desktop icons aren't rendered. ps -aux shows:
>
>
> eliot 6044 0.9 1.0 34720 8040 ? Ssl 12:49 0:00 nautilus
> --no-default-window --sm-client-id default3
>
>
> If I wait 5 or 10 minutes, they eventually show up and that process
> disappears
> to be replaced with:
>
>
> eliot 6190 0.6 2.5 44084 19664 ? Ssl 12:53 0:01 nautilus
> --sm-client-id 117f000001000110924937300000059310001 --screen 0
>
>
> It's been like this for a few weeks now and I also noticed my iPod doesn't
> automount anymore when I plug it in like it used to (over firewire). Don't
> know
> if that's related. My machine is up to date.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eliot Stock.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:24:16 +0100
> From: Giulio Sorrentino <numerone.fedora at wooow.it>
> Subject: Re: new to list
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <421DE390.4080006 at wooow.it>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Aakash wrote:
>
>> hi all,
>>
>> I am a new member of the group and first thing that i would like to
>> know is how to get the software.How can i get the media kit for fedora
>> project?
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Aakash Munjal
>
> Fedora does not have a media kit: you have to download and install
> programs manually.
> I think you are searching an audio and a vide player: i suggest you xmms
> for audio (which is included in fedora) and kaffeine for video (try a
> search using www.fedoratracker.org).
> For using yum (fedora installer) I suggest you a GUI, such as yumex
> (http://linux.rasmil.dk/mambo/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=52&Itemid=41).
>
> Wellcome.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:58:48 +0530
> From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: GFS and Fedora
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <c79487d60502240628903c087 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:11:03 +0100, Giulio Sorrentino
> <numerone.fedora at wooow.it> wrote:
>> Which could be advantages for home users using that filesystem?
>
> Though its a common perception Fedora isnt solely meant to be used by
> home users.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rahul Sundaram
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 20
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:59:53 +0530
> From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: desktop icons take 10 mins to appear after login
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <c79487d605022406293872224a at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:17:11 +0000, Eliot Stock
> <fedora_list at eliotstock.com> wrote:
>> Afternoon everyone.
>>
>> Something funny is up with nautilus on my FC3 box.
>>
>> When I log in the desktop icons aren't rendered. ps -aux shows:
>>
>> eliot 6044 0.9 1.0 34720 8040 ? Ssl 12:49 0:00 nautilus
>> --no-default-window --sm-client-id default3
>>
>> If I wait 5 or 10 minutes, they eventually show up and that process
>> disappears
>> to be replaced with:
>>
>> eliot 6190 0.6 2.5 44084 19664 ? Ssl 12:53 0:01 nautilus
>> --sm-client-id 117f000001000110924937300000059310001 --screen 0
>>
>> It's been like this for a few weeks now and I also noticed my iPod
>> doesn't
>> automount anymore when I plug it in like it used to (over firewire).
>> Don't know
>> if that's related. My machine is up to date.
>
> please file bug reports against nautilus and the kernel in
> bugzilla.redhat.com.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rahul Sundaram
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 12, Issue 384
> ********************************************
>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list