Problems with rpm database

[Axel Thimm]

On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:35:30AM -0500, Carl Reynolds wrote:
> William Hooper wrote:
> > Carl Reynolds said:
> > > I just installed Fedora Core 3 x86_64 on a machine and used rpm to get
> > > atrpms-kickcstart for the x86_64 architecture.
> > > When I run
> > > apt-get update

> > Has apt been upgraded to work with Fedora x86_64 yet?

> The rpm I used to install it is 
> http://download.atrpms.net/other/packages/fedora-3-i386/atrpms/atrpms-kickstart-25-1.rhfc3.at.x86_64.rpm
> 
> Since it has x86_64 I guess I assumed it is for the 64 bit Fedora Core 3 
> distribution.

It is and it works like a charm iff you avoid multilib, e.g. remove
all overlapping i386 packages. For servers that don't need openoffice
or HelixPlayer that's not a major loss.

   http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=326
   http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=334

See

   http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=334#c2

for how to make your system "singlelib".
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050225/35e10a56/attachment-0001.sig>