IS FC3 stable?
Pete
pete at surfusa.net
Mon Jan 10 23:24:56 UTC 2005
Thanks Aly, I'll look into that one too.
Pete
Aly Dharshi wrote:
> There is also something called Courier IMAP which is a fairly robust
> POP and IMAP system, which should be included into future FC series. I
> find that its fairly powerful, haven't used it in a while though.
>
> One thing to remember about Courier IMAP is that IT IS A MAILDIR ONLY
> system.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Aly.
>
>> I agree Cyrus is different, and not necessarily in a bad way. But I
>> would still like to see a bit more supporting doc's if it's included
>> in the distro. And I love vi, it's just not having to remember the
>> options and configuration parameters to hundreds of programs that I
>> don't like. Even a partial front-end is often all one needs to
>> configure and implement a new package. I also don't really mind
>> editing files, if I know after I'm done it's all going to work.
>> Front-end's usually make that process a bit easier. I remember the
>> days of Xenix and Unix, and I don't long for the days when everything
>> was done through vi. It's called progress. And as I often say to
>> the Linux newcomers, I was into Linux before it was cool, lol, I just
>> have better things to do than edit 6 or 7 files. And thanks for the
>> pointer for Dovecot, that might fit my needs better. I was
>> distressed to see my pop3 server from RH9 was gone, and dovecot
>> doesn't really say 'POP SERVER' to me, so I over-looked it.
>>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list