Incorect MD5 checksums or what a hell ???

Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org
Wed Jan 5 15:19:24 UTC 2005


On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:07:17PM +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
> There's no need. Yes, the md5sums are wrong but RPM packages have 
> built-in checksums (and these RPMs also have GPG signatures), which you 
> can check using "rpm --checksig *.rpm"

Although, yeah, it's a good point that the checksums in the advisory
*should* match.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>




More information about the fedora-list mailing list