ATrpms Real Issues

[Axel Thimm]

On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:34:26AM -0500, Neal D. Becker wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:54:13AM -0500, Neal D. Becker wrote:
> >> I really appreciate atrpms.  I do have 1 issue with them (at least, IIRC
> >> is is ATrpms that have this problem).
> >> 
> >> Since I'm using x86_64, I often need to build from srpms.
> > 
> > ATrpms does have x86_64 support for FC2 and FC3.
> 
> Yeah, it does _now_ :)

? It has since May 2004. In fact all build boxes used for ATrpms are
Dual-Opterons running FC2/x86_86/smp or FC3/x86_86/smp. :)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050106/b8e02dba/attachment-0001.sig>