mplayer as dependency error
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Jan 11 10:24:47 UTC 2005
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:52:21PM -0800, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 22:23 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > The above sounds as if ATrpms is a use-alone repo, while it's
> > fedora.us that chose to live inside walls :(
> >
> > (Max, I know you didn't mean it that way, but it may be read so :)
>
> I totally understand.
>
> Well, I might phrase it as "ATrpms and fedora.us did not come to an
> agreement about conflicts and naming." :-)
Well, it's worse than that, there wasn't any attempt to do so, since
this is against the still current fedora.us' menifesto. :(
> But you're still right -- I didn't mean to shine any bad light on
> you at all, Axel. I really appreciate all the work you do; I use
> your packages on a *lot* of my systems.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050111/5ce86353/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list