Static routes file

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Sa, den 15.01.2005 schrieb Thomas E. Dukes um 18:14:

> Its contents are:
> 
> eth1 net 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw

And for what reason did you create that anyway? It is not necessary - at
least I do not see any difference from letting the route being
automatically made from the network scripts based on the data in the
ifcfg-eth1 config file. So remote the static routes file.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.10-1.9_FC2smp 
Serendipity 18:31:59 up 1 day, 1:54, load average: 0.06, 0.16, 0.13 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050115/c7f0edd9/attachment-0001.sig>