Which 'bind' does Network Manager want?

[William Hooper]

David Cary Hart said:
> On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 10:35 -0600, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
>
>
>> I don't see why NetworkManager would require you to install or run DNS
>> server (other than to bloat your machine further).  Oh well.
>>
> I agree yet, for some reason, it does AND it's entirely UNDOCUMENTED. NM
> overwrites resolv.conf to localhost.

[whooper at token i386]$ rpm -qp --changelog
NetworkManager-0.3.3-1.cvs20050112.1.fc3.i386.rpm | head
* Wed Jan 12 2005 <dcbw at redhat.com> - 0.3.3-1.cvs20050112

- Update to latest CVS
- Fixes to DHCP code
- Link-Local (ZeroConf/Rendezvous) support
- Use bind in "caching-nameserver" mode to work around stupidity
        in glibc's resolver library not recognizing resolv.conf changes
- #rh144818# Clean up the specfile (Patch from Matthias Saou)
- Ad-Hoc mode support with Link-Local addressing only (for now)
- Fixes for device activation race conditions
[whooper at token i386]$

Looks like the fact that it is using a local copy of bind is at least
documented in the changelog.  I would guess that the changelog in
/usr/share/doc also reflects it.

-- 
William Hooper