FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support

[Richard Kelsch]

Hey, I'm game.

Les Mikesell wrote:

>On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:27, Richard Kelsch wrote:
>  
>
>>I still stand by my claim that FC4 fails 
>>the intentions of the project.  Nevertheless, I know it will be fixed 
>>eventually, perhaps FC5.
>>    
>>
>
>But you could bet that it would not be fixed if it wasn't released in
>its current state so people could fix it.   That's the point of the
>fedora releases - it is supposed to meet the usability intentions
>by the *end* of a release, when the effort shifts to a new batch
>of code and the updates to this one stop.  Since there are 3 prior
>releases you can get a pretty good idea how this works by looking
>back at the updates that made the other versions usable.
>
>--
>  Les Mikesell
>    lesmikesell at futuresource.com
>
>
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050701/5b943754/attachment-0001.htm>