WARNING:DO NOT UPGRADE TO CORE 4
Mike McCarty
mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net
Wed Jul 13 18:00:11 UTC 2005
Timothy Murphy wrote:
>Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>
>
>>>Consider the possibility that an installation might not work on machine
>>>X, but an upgrade might.
>>>
>>>
>>Then you've created a totally unique situation where the reason it works
>>at all is likely because you have bits and pieces of some unrelated
>>version still running. That might work for you, but if you have
>>problems no one else will understand them or be able to help.
>>
>>
>
>How can one have "bits and pieces of some unrelated version still running"
>if you do a clean install?
>
>
Erm, he was responding to your comment on having an upgrade
work when a clean install won't. His point is well-taken, I think.
>I'm not actually asking for your help,
>I'm simply pointing out that your dogmatic assertion
>that installation is always better than upgrade
>is not true, giving as a counter-example
>the fact that I have a machine where the first did not work,
>and the second did.
>
>
I think that your comment about upgrade being in some instances
better than install is well-taken, but not supported by your argument.
IMO Mode on:
A better argument is that if Linux is ever to overtake W* as a user-friendly
OS, it had better find a way to upgrade W/O smashing all user data.
Period.
End of argument.
If overtaking W* is not a goal, then whatever floats your boat is fine.
[snip]
Backup is another area which is black magic at present under *NIX
systems. Until the time comes when a user, upon boot, is presented
with an option to create a disaster recovery set, and is allowed to
make checkpoints to CD/DVD/Whatever by just clicking on a widget
somewhere, then Linux, in all its incarnations, has a long long way
to go just to catch up to W*, let alone overtake it and pass it by.
Just my $0.02 worth. YMMV
IMO Mode off
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list