owner of /etc /boot and / (related to can't su thread???)
Paul Howarth
paul at city-fan.org
Fri Jul 8 13:28:03 UTC 2005
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
>> Am Fr, den 08.07.2005 schrieb Shawn um 8:13:
>>
>>> quite recently I mistakenly did something like chown -R jr /
>
> [snip]
>
>>> I wonder if etc and boot shouldn't properly be owned by root?
>>
>> Sure, they have to be root owned.
>>
> They *have* to be root ownership? What is there which will not function
> if they are not root ownership?
Anything that was originally owned by root will "work" as before, but
represents a potential security issue as user "jr" will now have access
to them and that user should not have that access.
Anything that was originally owned by a different user than root is
likely not to work, because the process that needs to access that data
will be running as the correct userid, not "jr".
Paul.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list