Forced FSCK on Bad Reboot
Mike McCarty
mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net
Fri Jul 8 19:39:08 UTC 2005
Tony Nelson wrote:
>At 1:28 PM -0500 7/8/05, Mike McCarty wrote:
>
>
[Linux no longer does an extended check after power outage boot]
>You could always switch back to Ext2 if you want long checks. This is
>probably not a good idea.
>
>
>
Why is this not a good idea? Not that I want to change anything.
>
>
>>What is the rationale for the default being just to mount?
>>
>>
>
>Through the miracle of Ext3, a full fsck is no longer needed in most cases.
>The short check replays the Ext3 "journal"; I think it will do a long check
>if the journal doesn't take care of the problem. Replay should be much
>more reliable than fsck trying to guess what would have been correct.
>
>
Hmm. Yet the boot has an option to do an extended check. If the extended
check doesn't do any aditional useful work, then why is it an option?
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list