freenx and atrpms

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 07:44:04PM -0500, Jeff Vian wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 23:06 +0200, Eric Tanguy wrote:
> > I would very happy to see that nx and freenx was released for fc4 by
> > atrpms but i can't understand why i found nx but not freenx in
> > http://dl.atrpms.net/fc4-i386/atrpms/stable/ whereas freenx seems to be
> > in http://dl.atrpms.net/fc4-i386/atrpms/RPMS.bleeding/ . I have to
> > enable the 2 repos to update nx and freenx ?
> > 
> 
> Bleeding means testing/often unstable and definitely not for the novice.
> 
> Yes, if one is in atrpms-stable and the other is in atrpms-bleeding and
> you wish to install both, you will need to enable both repos

freenx is moving to stable today. I wanted to do some more testing on
x86_64 (mainly RHEL4), as the x86_64 builds are a bit adventurous.

To be honest I intended to move this earlier, and forgot about it. :/

For such bug(lets) kick my ass on bugzilla.atrpms.net :)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050719/4448086f/attachment-0001.sig>