RPM oddness with FC2: RESOLVED

Mike McCarty mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net
Wed Jul 20 17:52:05 UTC 2005


Mike McCarty wrote:

[details of install snipped]

> I decided to uninstall. But then I hit some problems. Here is
> the current behavior of rpm, which I find confusing.
>
> # rpm -e newlib-68hc1x-1.12.0-3.0.1.i586.rpm
> error: package newlib-68hc1x-1.12.0-3.0.1.i586.rpm is not installed
> # rpm -i newlib-68hc1x-1.12.0-3.0.1.i586.rpm
>        package newlib-68hc1x-1.12.0-3.0.1 is already installed
> # rpm -e newlib-68hc1x-1.12.0-3.0.1.i586.rpm
> error: package newlib-68hc1x-1.12.0-3.0.1.i586.rpm is not installed

Ah, but then I read a message by Bruce Stanley which jogged my
memory. One installs packages from files, but one removes packages.

So I did:

# rpm -ev binutils-68hc1x-2.15-3.0.1.i586
# rpm -ev gcc-68hc1x-3.3.5-3.0.1.i586
# rpm -ev gdb-68hc1x-6.2-3.0.1.i586
# rpm -ev newlib-68hc1x-1.12.0-3.0.1.i586
# ls /usr/bin/m6811*
ls: /usr/bin/m6811*: No such file or directory

Which indicates that the files are now gone.

Thanks for this wonderful group, and especially Bruce Stanley.

Mike

-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!




More information about the fedora-list mailing list