Rpmbuild Precedence Problem
David Cary Hart
fedora at tqmcube.com
Wed Jul 20 22:20:36 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 23:58 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am Mi, den 20.07.2005 schrieb David Cary Hart um 23:51:
>
> > What did I screw up to achieve this remarkable result? Both of these are
> > custom RPMs. I know that I can override with --oldpackage but I'd prefer
> > to correct my error.
> >
> > "package postfix-2.2.4-1.FC4 (which is newer than
> > postfix-2.2.5-3.FC4) is already installed"
>
> Did you edit the .spec files? The "Epoch" (if set) can be the reason to
> let rpm see that the 2.2.4-1.FC4 package bigger/fresher than the
> 2.2.5-3.FC4 postfix package.
Sure. I migrated the src.rpm. The epoch is the same in both. I thought
that the epoch tag was to be incremented ONLY to resolve ambiguous
version numbers. I know that I can do that but I'm trying to determine
why rpm doesn't see that 2.2.5-3 is newer than 2.2.4-1.
In this case it is relatively safe to use epoch since there are no
packages (other than pfloggsumm) that depend on postfix (mutt is not
installed).
--
Tired of spam? Do YOUR part: http://www.BoulderPledge.org
* Eliminate Spam: http://www.TQMcube.com/spam_trap.htm
* RBLDNSD HowTo: http://www.TQMcube.com/rbldnsd.htm
* Multi-RBL Check: http://www.TQMcube.com/rblcheck.htm
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list