Network subnet question

[Kai Zhang]

No, 192.168.0.1 is on 192.168.0 network provided 255.255.255.0 as mask
192.168.1.1 is on 192.168.1 network provided 255.255.255.0 as mask


On 7/26/05, Andy Pieters <mailings at vlaamse-kern.com> wrote:
> Hi All
> 
> I have a question.
> 
> Is 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.1.1 on the same subnet?
> 
> I ask because someone is having a headless server that we are supposed to
> connect to on 192.168.1.1 but it isn't replying and we are on 192.168.0.3
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> 
> Andy
> 
> --
> Registered Linux User Number 379093
>   Cockroaches and socialites are the only things that can
>   stay up all night and eat anything.
>                                            Herb Caen
> --
> -- --BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.1
> GAT/O/>E$ d-(---)>+ s:(+)>: a--(-)>? C++++$(+++) UL++++>++++$ P-(+)>++
> L+++>++++$ E---(-)@ W+++>+++$ !N@ o? !K? W--(---) !O !M- V-- PS++(+++)
> PE--(-) Y+ PGP++(+++) t+(++) 5-- X++ R*(+)@ !tv b-() DI(+) D+(+++) G(+)
> e>++++$@ h++(*) r-->++ y--()>++++
> -- ---END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> --
> Check out these few php utilities that I released
>  under the GPL2 and that are meant for use with a
>  php cli binary:
> 
>  http://www.vlaamse-kern.com/sas/
> --
> 
> --
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 
> 
>