Yum & up2date dont agree

Alexander Dalloz ad+lists at uni-x.org
Thu Jun 2 21:41:15 UTC 2005


Am Do, den 02.06.2005 schrieb kevin.kempter at dataintellect.com um 23:12:

> My /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources file has these entries in it:
> # base
> # Fedora Core 3 - i386 - Base
> #
> apt base http://ayo.freshrpms.net fedora/linux/3/i386 core
> 
> # updates-released
> # Fedora Core 3 - i386 - Released Updates
> #
> apt updates-released http://ayo.freshrpms.net fedora/linux/3/i386 updates

[ ... ]

The format of the up2date source file entries is documented in the file
itself.

http://www.fedoranews.org/contributors/alexander_dalloz/mirror/

An older article, but it may show you the format differences between yum
and up2date entries.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp 
Serendipity 23:39:23 up 9 days, 22:17, load average: 0.21, 0.21, 0.18 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050602/66d87daf/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list