What repository to choose + kernel backwards compatibility
Andy Pieters
mailings at vlaamse-kern.com
Thu Jun 9 11:05:50 UTC 2005
> If the development repository gets enabled by the installer by default
> and you are not running a test release, thats a extremely serious bug. I
> think this is a user misconfiguration
>
Well I am running a test release aint I. After all it says Fedora Core 4 Test
3...
Andy
--
Registered Linux User Number 379093
-- --BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GAT/O/>E$ d-(---)>+ s:(+)>: a--(-)>? C++++$(+++) UL++++>++++$ P-(+)>++
L+++>++++$ E---(-)@ W+++>+++$ !N@ o? !K? W--(---) !O !M- V-- PS++(+++)
PE--(-) Y+ PGP++(+++) t+(++) 5-- X++ R*(+)@ !tv b-() DI(+) D+(+++) G(+)
e>++++$@ h++(*) r-->++ y--()>++++
-- ---END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
--
Check out these few php utilities that I released
under the GPL2 and that are meant for use with a
php cli binary:
http://www.vlaamse-kern.com/sas/
--
--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050609/ab05fa16/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list