FC3 core over RH9, now no BIND :(
Darryl Jones
darryl at spyproductions.com
Thu Jun 30 14:42:23 UTC 2005
I have a virtual server (fresh install) which has been running since Feb
with FC3 and SELinux enabled with no problems whatsoever. In fact, it's so
stable we're rolling it out as a customer platform. Thanks for the input
though
Darryl Jones
System Administrator
SpyProductions
Achieve Web Success
http://spyproductions.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of John Summerfied
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 11:30 PM
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> Subject: Re: FC3 core over RH9, now no BIND :(
>
>
> Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > Am Do, den 30.06.2005 schrieb John Summerfied um 4:04:
> >
> >
> >>Darryl Jones wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi Guys,
> >>>
> >>>We installed FC3 over RH9 this weekend, and now BIND isn't
> seeing the
> >>>zone files in /var/named. I did a chown named:named for all the
> >>>files, made sure the path was in named.conf....nothing. I replaced
> >>>named.conf with a backup (pre FC) copy, nothing.
> >>
> >>You should understand that FC is a test-bed. It's probably
> broken when
> >>it's installed, it seems certain to break at least once
> before its next
> >>release. Worse, it has a short life cycle.
> >
> >
> >>John
> >
> >
> > Sorry John, one hasn't to do with the other. Or you may had the
> > intention to reply in a different thread. Darryl upgraded
> from a non
> > Fedora distribution where no upgrade path is supported in
> any way and
> > he is confronted with a change of the default configuration
> of bind. I
> > don't see why there is need to comment that with "FC is a test-bed"
> > and "probably broken".
>
> It seems from what else he said that his is a pretty important job
> (primary DNS for various domains). For such a task, I think
> the choice
> of FC unwise, it's the sort of thing you want to have running
> hour after
> hour, day after day, week after week, month after month....
>
> Reports and experience here suggest FC is not the best choice
> for such
> important work.
>
>
> --
>
> Cheers
> John
>
> -- spambait
> 1aaaaaaa at computerdatasafe.com.au
> Z1aaaaaaa at computerdatasafe.com.au Tourist pics
> http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list