[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: Setting up named as secondary



Damn, I found it: I only have UDP but no TCP open for port 53.... That's when using the official IPs. So that works now.

The VPN IPs still don't work, although those go through a cipe tunnel and should not get blocked by the firewall.
Ssh works too without problems, so why not named?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-list-bounces redhat com 
> [mailto:fedora-list-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 4:04 PM
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> Subject: Re: Setting up named as secondary
> 
> 
> Am Sa, den 11.06.2005 schrieb Mark um 0:46:
> 
> > I have a master and secondary DNS server. The secondary 
> tries to do a 
> > zone-transfer from the master, but reports a connection refused. 
> > However, the master claims it approved the transfer.
> 
> > The master configuration file is:
> 
> > zone "my-domain.com" {
> >         notify no;
> >         type slave;
> >         file "pz/named.<MY_DOMAIN>.com";
> >         masters { 192.168.1.136; };
> > };
> 
> Paste error? Saying it is the master and the zone definition 
> does not match.
> 
> Side note: if you are running bind chrooted the slave zone 
> files have to be located into the slaves directory.
> 
> > MARK
> 
> Alexander
> 
> 
> -- 
> Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 
> 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html 
> Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp 
> Serendipity 01:00:45 up 17 days, 23:38, load average: 0.37, 
> 0.18, 0.12 
> 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]