[FC4]Samba doesn't accessible to Windows
Alexander Dalloz
ad+lists at uni-x.org
Tue Jun 28 17:52:45 UTC 2005
Am Di, den 28.06.2005 schrieb Scot L. Harris um 19:35:
> > > Isn't it 137, 138 UDP and 139 and 445 TCP?
> >
> > > Scot L. Harris
> >
> > Hehe, now you got me :) Scot, you are right. Sometimes it is better to
> > not give such information out of head but to look at the documentation:
>
> No gotcha intended. :)
>
> I thought I might have been setting things wrong. Personally I have
> never seen consistent response when trying to use nautilius to browse
> windows shares from linux.
I feel that is something nasty with nautilus or gnome-vfs(2)-smb. Many
people share that experience. I face that too on my workstation where no
iptables rules are active (my BSD router runs PF).
> Should udp and tcp be opened up for all of those ports?
As far as I know it is sufficient to open port 137 and 138 UDP only and
ports 139 and 445 TCP only.
> Scot L. Harris
Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp
Serendipity 19:46:40 up 3 days, 2:38, load average: 0.12, 0.21, 0.22
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050628/015339dc/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list