[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [FC4]Samba doesn't accessible to Windows

Am Di, den 28.06.2005 schrieb Scot L. Harris um 19:35:

> > > Isn't it 137, 138 UDP and 139 and 445 TCP?
> > 
> > > Scot L. Harris
> > 
> > Hehe, now you got me :) Scot, you are right. Sometimes it is better to
> > not give such information out of head but to look at the documentation:
> No gotcha intended.  :)
> I thought I might have been setting things wrong.  Personally I have
> never seen consistent response when trying to use nautilius to browse
> windows shares from linux.  

I feel that is something nasty with nautilus or gnome-vfs(2)-smb. Many
people share that experience. I face that too on my workstation where no
iptables rules are active (my BSD router runs PF).

> Should udp and tcp be opened up for all of those ports?

As far as I know it is sufficient to open port 137 and 138 UDP only and
ports 139 and 445 TCP only.

> Scot L. Harris


Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp 
Serendipity 19:46:40 up 3 days, 2:38, load average: 0.12, 0.21, 0.22 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]