Gnome vs KDE

[Mark Panen]

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:33:38 -0700, Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 14:24 -0500, David Curry wrote:
> > Craig White wrote:
> >
> 
> >
> > Are you saying Gnome vs. KDE is absurd, or are you saying that my report
> > of KDE malfunction is absurd.  Report of an inability to mount CD drives
> > in KDE while they are mountable in Gnome  is consistent with QA
> > testing.  Is that absurd?
> ----
> No - sorry - haven't run KDE in a while - there may indeed be a CD drive
> mounting problem in KDE and I wouldn't know it.
> 
> Just the notion that there are vast differences between the two (which
> there are - but Red Hat (and thus Fedora) has sought to blur the
> differences and make them appear to be much the same.
> 
> I'm quite certain that a GNOME desktop as delivered by GNOME and a KDE
> desktop as delivered by KDE - without Red Hat / Fedora alterations might
> demonstrate some of the differences more readily.
> 
> Craig


Ok to answer your question straight, KDE is better.