Reducing Load on Amavisd-new/Spamassassin/Antivir

Alexander Dalloz ad+lists at uni-x.org
Wed Mar 2 21:14:42 UTC 2005


Am Mi, den 02.03.2005 schrieb Roger Grosswiler um 21:14:

> so, i do my very best to answer all your questions:
> 
> 1) i don't use clam, i use antivir (h+b edv)

Yes, I did understand that from your first posting. I don't think
antivir is a problem.

> 2) the machine is a old p3/866 mhz with 128 mb ram only, running fc3 (a 
> granny machine...)

Low on RAM, but CPU power is enough for what you run and the amount of
mail.

> 3) mail quantity is about 300-400 per day. Average use is according to 
> tload between 0.90 and 3.50 (peaks) avg about 1.3 *ouch*

So Ø 1 mail each 2 minutes. That is not much. Can you say how long a
mail needs from initial connect by the foreign MTA up to the final
storage?

> 4) spamassassin is running as daemon (3 childprocesses)
> 5) amavisd-new is running as dameon (3 childprocesses)

Is fine I think. Did you import a lot of custom rulesets into
SpamAssassin additional to those coming with the package (keyword: rules
du jour)? Do you use RBL checks with SpamAssassin and other external
checks?

> Roger

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.14_FC2smp 
Serendipity 22:03:28 up 9 days, 9:12, load average: 0.06, 0.31, 0.33 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050302/9f1b2e6c/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list