fc3 - raid 1 setup problems
rado
rado at rivers-bend.com
Thu Mar 3 07:43:38 UTC 2005
> > ok I did "linux ide=nodma" ....it looks like that was the problem!
> >
> > but now that opens up another can of worms. so now, yes, I am sure that
> > the problem was/is in the hardware and not w/my raid configuration.
> > during this install(which is still going on) this system has lost at
> > least 90% of it's speed! Considering that w/out dma, everything has to
> > come and go thru the processor really dragging the system down...then
> > also the type of operation we are asking the system to do; write to 2
> > hard drives instead of 1, puts more stress on the processor. It just
> > doesn't seem to be the route to go.
> >
> > I am going to let it finish installing....2 1/2 more hrs...let it boot
> > up and I am really considering swapping the motherboard out w/a spare
> > slot A I have here and try installing normally.
> >
> > At least we did narrow down the problem thx to Alexander's suggestion
> >
> > john rose
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> You might try to remove the ide=nodma from the grub.conf file to see if
> the system works with dma. I believe that the option is inserted in the
> grub.conf file if you use the paranmeter during installation.
>
> Jim
>
hummmmm, maybe so...put dma back in...just keep on tweaking and building
the sys up and see what gives....in back my mind tho, if in this
instance, this problem is real and repeats. what is to say that some
package that might be run, after the system is configured, surfaces the
dma problem again? I dunno...guess it's damned if you do and damned if
you don't kinda deal.
after it finishes this install, I will tweak the grub.conf and run it a
bit just for reference but I am prone to swapping out this motherboard
and shoot for a perfect install. If I didn't have the hardware on
hand...be different but I do have a brand new mb just itching to run
something lol.
thx
John Rose
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:21:59 +0100
> From: Thomas Zehetbauer <thomasz at hostmaster.org>
> Subject: Re: Security Breach ?
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <1109852519.4491.5.camel at hostmaster.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 08:18 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > You don't say which distribution this web server was running, but I
> > suspect that if your Apache had been running under SELinux then the
> > attacker would not have been able to run any scripts from /tmp
> > or /var/tmp. So, when you rebuild the server, it would be well worth
> > considering using SELinux.
>
> You don't need SELinux for this, you could always mount /tmp with noexec
> flag.
>
> Tom
>
> --
> T h o m a s Z e h e t b a u e r ( TZ251 )
> PGP encrypted mail preferred - KeyID 96FFCB89
> finger thomasz at hostmaster.org for key
>
> We are tied to the ocean. And we go back to the sea, whether it is to sail or
> to watch it we are going back from whence we came. - John F. Kennedy
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 481 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050303/48d6e06b/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:22:42 +0100
> From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org>
> Subject: Re: clamav
> To: Ankush Grover <ankush174 at gmail.com>, For users of Fedora Core
> releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109852562.9846.363.camel at serendipity.dogma.lan>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
>
> Am Do, den 03.03.2005 schrieb Ankush Grover um 12:18:
>
> > I am in the process of configuring Clamav ,but i don't know which
> > files i need to put in cron jobs like file which will be downloading
> > the virus updates from the net , how to setup the clamav if there is
> > any virus then repair or delete the file, scanning atleast weekly the
> > system or scheduling etc.
>
> ClamAV comes with the freshclam service to do automatic virus signature
> file updates. You too can run a cronjob.
> There is no real need to scan your Fedora system with any anti-virus
> tool like ClamAV. It can make sense to scan Samba share directories
> where Windows people store their possibly infected files.
>
> > I came to know about the Mailscanner ,it is the software/utility
> > which uses clamav and spamassassin for removing viruses and worms,i
> > haven't used the Mailscanner so far so don't know the full use of
> > it.Do i have to download updates regularly for Mailscanner just like
> > for clamav(virus updates) so that Mailscanner works effectively.
>
> It makes sense to look for MailScanner updates as there are certainly
> code improvements for better mail processing results. ClamAV can be
> updated easily by using one of the repositories for Fedora Core.
>
> > Ankush
>
> Alexander
>
>
> --
> Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
> legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
> Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.14_FC2smp
> Serendipity 13:18:29 up 10 days, 27 users, load average: 0.49, 0.37,
> 0.22
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050303/7c450511/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:23:17 +0100
> From: Duncan Lithgow <duncan at lithgow-schmidt.dk>
> Subject: Re: got the isos...........
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109852597.6336.18.camel at 3e6b2f59.rev.stofanet.dk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 20:25 -0500, EvilEvilWayz at aol.com wrote:
> > Ok, got the four isos, checksums are fine, burned them to my hard
> > drive, burned them(the images) to cds twice, where the &!&**!@%*&$@$%
> > #$%@$*@ is the installer? I don't already have linux running already.
> > I'd like to have a dual boot system but it's looking like too much
> > damn trouble.
> >
> > Hecklers welcome.
> >
> > -wolf
>
> Please don't post in html. Please read:
> http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml
>
> Duncan
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050303/b9223579/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:26:28 +0000
> From: Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org>
> Subject: Re: Security Breach ?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <42270274.1020709 at city-fan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 08:18 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
> >
> >>You don't say which distribution this web server was running, but I
> >>suspect that if your Apache had been running under SELinux then the
> >>attacker would not have been able to run any scripts from /tmp
> >>or /var/tmp. So, when you rebuild the server, it would be well worth
> >>considering using SELinux.
> >
> >
> > You don't need SELinux for this, you could always mount /tmp with noexec
> > flag.
>
> And /var too, provided they're separate partitions. Another good reason
> not to install into just one big / partition.
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:38:06 +0100
> From: "roland brouwers" <roland at cat.be>
> Subject: nc
> To: <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <000e01c51fed$d9c7d730$a00ff80a at pccat03>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I have RH9
> I run
> Yum install expect nc
> When I install the rpm
> rpm -Uvh nx-1.4.0-0.fdr.4.i386.rpm
>
>
> warning: nx-1.4.0-0.fdr.4.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
> b90aee70
> error: Failed dependencies:
>
> xorg-x11 is needed by nx-1.4.0-0.fdr.4
>
> xorg-x11-tools is needed by nx-1.4.0-0.fdr.4
>
>
> what is this?
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> Roland Brouwers
> C.A.T. bvba
> Zevenbergenlaan 16
> 2660 ANTWERP (Hoboken)
> BELGIUM
> Email roland at cat.be
> Phone + 32 475 44 31 05 * Fax + 32 3 830 33 05
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050303/9b709bab/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:44:41 +0000
> From: Ian Malone <ibm21 at cam.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: I really do!
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <422706B9.9060206 at cam.ac.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
> > Am Do, den 03.03.2005 schrieb Bill McMenemy um 9:14:
>
> >> So, I guess I'm stuck with the 2.4.20-8 kernel, and the downlevel
> >> packages that RH9 shipped with; in the words of the manic smiling
> >> guy riding his
>
> > Please don't use that kernel! It has more severe security flaws you
> > can count with one hand. It is the initial RH9 kernel which got many
> > updates even in the time when RH9 was supported by Red Hat (before
> > EOL).
>
> My suggestion to the OP would be to start a new thread to see
> if anyone can get his Linmodem sorted out. I use a Lucent
> modem and with a little messing about the drivers can be made
> to compile using the kernel headers package.
>
> W/Linmodems are definitely still a pain. I had fun with Ubuntu
> when I couldn't find gcc on the Live CD[1], which really does give
> you a Catch 22.
>
> [1] Not sure if this is still the case, and apparently there is
> some kind of devel package on the install CD, just not installed
> by default.
> --
> imalone
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:54:46 +0000
> From: Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org>
> Subject: Re: nc
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <42270916.6040609 at city-fan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> roland brouwers wrote:
> > I have RH9
> >
> > I run
> >
> > Yum install expect nc
> >
> > When I install the rpm
> >
> > rpm -Uvh
> > nx-1.4.0-0.fdr.4.i386.rpm
> >
> > warning: nx-1.4.0-0.fdr.4.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
> > b90aee70
> >
> > error: Failed
> > dependencies:
> >
> > xorg-x11 is needed by
> > nx-1.4.0-0.fdr.4
> >
> > xorg-x11-tools is needed by
> > nx-1.4.0-0.fdr.4
> >
> > what is this?
>
> You are trying to install a Fedora package built against X.org libraries
> on to a Red Hat 9 system, which uses XFree86. Whilst it's possible to
> build packages that are compatible with both X.org and XFree86, this
> isn't one of them. You'll need to find a Red Hat version of the package,
> or build one yourself.
>
> P.S. Please don't post HTML to this mailing list.
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:57:51 +0000
> From: Thiago Guzella <thiago.guzella at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Security Breach ?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <7608a89f05030304571d0d01b1 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Well, I'm not sure on the relevance of my comment, but here it goes:
> the script is brazilian-portuguese coded...
>
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 18:12:05 -0500, Chris Strzelczyk
> <cstrzelczyk at nobletechnology.net> wrote:
> > Alright well not it's certain I have a friend on my system. I have
> > found this file named "https" on my
> > system in /tmp
> >
> > I'm not as PERL savy as I want to be but it does open IRC on the
> > server. The file is owned by apache:apache. So it
> > looks like my friend is using Apache as a tool. Would anybody have a
> > clue on how he could get this in tmp and then run it?
> > The file was not set executable either.
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/perl
> > #
> > ...
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
> > > legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
> > > Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.14_FC2smp
> > > Serendipity 23:40:52 up 9 days, 10:49, load average: 0.91, 0.56, 0.39
> > > --
> > > fedora-list mailing list
> > > fedora-list at redhat.com
> > > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list at redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
>
>
> --
> Thiago dos Santos Guzella
> Electrical Enginnering Student - UFMG (www.ufmg.br), Brazil
> Linux User #354160
> UIN: 13465286. Jabber: tguzella @ jabber.org
>
> "Thou, nature, art my goddess; to thy laws my services are bound..."
> William Shakespeare
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:58:06 +0100
> From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org>
> Subject: Re: nc
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109854686.9846.367.camel at serendipity.dogma.lan>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Am Do, den 03.03.2005 schrieb roland brouwers um 13:38:
>
> Please don't send HTML formatted mails to this list. Thank you.
>
> > I have RH9
>
> Then this is the wrong list.
>
> > I run
> > Yum install expect nc
>
> This installed?
>
> > When I install the rpm
> > rpm -Uvh nx-1.4.0-0.fdr.4.i386.rpm
>
> That is something different and I don't see the connection to the
> previos install line.
>
> > warning: nx-1.4.0-0.fdr.4.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
> > b90aee70
>
> You need to install the GPG key the package is signed with, if you trust
> the packager.
>
> > error: Failed dependencies:
> >
> > xorg-x11 is needed by nx-1.4.0-0.fdr.4
> >
> > xorg-x11-tools is needed by nx-1.4.0-0.fdr.4
> >
> >
> > what is this?
>
> It clearly states you are missing packages: xorg-x11 and xorg-x11-tools
>
> > Roland Brouwers
>
> Alexander
>
>
> --
> Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
> legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
> Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.14_FC2smp
> Serendipity 13:55:55 up 10 days, 1:04, load average: 0.01, 0.06, 0.09
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050303/965317b8/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 05:02:03 -0800 (PST)
> From: Ahamarshan jn <ashgene at yahoo.co.in>
> Subject: FC2 -DELL 8400 INTEGRATED ETHERNET GIGABIT PROBLEM
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <20050303130203.44761.qmail at web8303.mail.in.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hello,
> I have a DELL-8400 Series PC with SATA drive and I dual booted it with winxp-prof and FedoraCore2 , there was and still a problem with the sata drive not getting recognised by FC2, i have overcome this by changing the settings in bios (i need to do this everytime i boot!), also while booting it says Unrecognised board/chipset, but the real problem is that when i try to connect to the internet, i get an error message that my device is not recognised. From the start-> system-> Network connection, i selected the eth0 and the device type as Intel Gigabit 1000.
> (Even after configuring the IP and settings)
> I also tried to build the kernel to 2.6.9.XX from 2.6.5 but all i got is Kernel panic and FC2 fail to boot.
> Can anyone help me solve this problem.
> I am new to Fedora.
> My system details are
> DELL-8400
> INTEL-925X Express chipset with ICH6-R
> INTEGRATED RAID CONTROLLER WITH INTEL Matrix storage
> INTEGRATED GIGABIT NETWORK CONTROLLER
> INTEL PENTIUM 4 PROCESSOR 550 WITH HT technology
> Serial ATA Hard drive with 8mb burst cache.
> 3GB DDR RAM.
>
> Any help
> Thank you
> - ash
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
> Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050303/05d1e2a7/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 14:10:13 +0100
> From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org>
> Subject: Re: FC2 -DELL 8400 INTEGRATED ETHERNET GIGABIT PROBLEM
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109855413.9846.372.camel at serendipity.dogma.lan>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Am Do, den 03.03.2005 schrieb Ahamarshan jn um 14:02:
>
> Please don't send HTML formatted mails to this list. Thank you.
> And you shouldn't write the subject in caps. This is bad style
> (shouting) and even triggers spam detection.
>
> > I have a DELL-8400 Series PC with SATA drive and I dual booted it with winxp-prof and FedoraCore2 , there was and still a problem with the sata drive not getting recognised by FC2, i have overcome this by changing the settings in bios (i need to do this everytime i boot!), also while booting it says Unrecognised board/chipset, but the real problem is that when i try to connect to the internet, i get an error message that my device is not recognised. From the start-> system-> Network connection, i selected the eth0 and the device type as Intel Gigabit 1000.
> > (Even after configuring the IP and settings)
> > I also tried to build the kernel to 2.6.9.XX from 2.6.5 but all i got is Kernel panic and FC2 fail to boot.
>
> You seem to have internet somehow as you can post here. So get the
> latest FC2 kernel - just today kernel-2.6.10-1.770_FC2 came out - with
> the system being online and burn it to CD. Then run a kernel update with
> FC2. This should help as there are many kernel based improvements since
> inital 2.6.5 of FC2.
>
> > My system details are
> > DELL-8400
> > INTEL-925X Express chipset with ICH6-R
> > INTEGRATED RAID CONTROLLER WITH INTEL Matrix storage
>
> You will have to deactivate this if enabled.
>
> > INTEGRATED GIGABIT NETWORK CONTROLLER
> > INTEL PENTIUM 4 PROCESSOR 550 WITH HT technology
> > Serial ATA Hard drive with 8mb burst cache.
> > 3GB DDR RAM.
>
> > - ash
>
> Alexander
>
>
> --
> Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
> legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
> Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.14_FC2smp
> Serendipity 14:06:44 up 10 days, 1:15, load average: 0.16, 0.30, 0.20
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050303/0c53d81b/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 14:17:32 +0100
> From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org>
> Subject: Re: got the isos...........
> To: duncan at lithgow-schmidt.dk, For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1109855852.9846.381.camel at serendipity.dogma.lan>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Am Do, den 03.03.2005 schrieb Duncan Lithgow um 13:23:
>
> > Please don't post in html. Please read:
> > http://www.georgedillon.com/web/html_email_is_evil.shtml
> >
> > Duncan
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> I think he has no choice. From his mail header:
>
> X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 1200
>
> This seems to be the AOL software. Once he migrated to Fedora he can use
> a fine mailer :) Hope he then uses too his real name rather than such a
> l33t script kids alias like now in his mail address.
>
> Alexander
--
The only thing Micro$oft has done for society is make people believe
that computers are inherently unreliable.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list