Fedora Desktop System Boot Time
David Curry
dsccable at comcast.net
Fri Mar 11 06:47:32 UTC 2005
An extended discussion has transpired under the thread, "Is Linux Really
Faster Than MS Windows." That discussion generally focused on the
respective boot times of the two operating systems and was dismissed by
operators of production server systems. But, one size does not fit
everyone.
In the world of desktop and laptop system operators, and to those
concerned with energy efficiency, differential boot times for the two
operating systems is a meaningful topic. These systems are frequently
shutdown by many users. Is there some impediment to participation of
knowledgeable list subscribers in laying out a linux boot scenario
comparable to that of a typical MS Windows desktop system? Continuing
relative disregard of the concerns of these users is helping to sustain
the dominance of MS Windows systems in many end user markets.
Google searches turned up several relevant messages that I have drawn on
for some suggestions of programs that might be omited from the boot
list. Others I have included out of curiosity and ignorance. System
security concern is also a factor.
Assume a desktop sytem with stable hardware configuration used for
general office applications with telephone connection for fax
send/receive, cable/dsl modem for internet connection to permit web
browsing, e-mail, and ftp file transfers. Sys op is security conscious,
but really does not want to be a sys op. Fedora installation omitted
server installation rpms, but otherwise has a default Fedora system boot
process. Which bootup programs could be omitted to reduce boot time and
strengthen system security while retaining full support for office
productivity, number crunching, etc.?
Boot exclusion candidates:
anacron
atd
crond
isdn (if no isdn connection)
kudzu
mdmpd
microc-ctl (assuming non-intel system)
nfs, nfslock, netfs, autofs, xfs
pcmcia (if not a laptop)
portmap
sendmail
ssh
Apparently, each of the above programs can be eliminated from boot
startup by deleting the symlink files in /etc/rc.d/rc3.d & rc5.d. Are
there strong reasons to not remove any of the above from boot startup?
Are there additional programs that could be dropped from boot startup
without affecting the functionality of the SOHO type system outlined?
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list