Antivirus in FC3?

[Craig White]

On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 21:29 +0100, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> On 20 Mar 2005, at 20:29, Craig White wrote:
> > Homogenous UID mappings are easily achieved through NIS or LDAP
> > implementation or simply replicating /etc/passwd & /etc/shadow
> > & /etc/group from computer to computer - perhaps a bit beyond the scope
> > of a home network but certainly achievable.
> 
> Right, but NIS/LDAP requires a lot of infraestructure which increases 
> complexity. Of course, they can be useful in medium/large networks, but 
> I think it's a bit overkill for a small network. Thus, I prefer Samba 
> as it doesn't require any additional infraestructure.
----
If you're not already running samba then you have to configure samba so
there would be the additional infrastructure.

If you've got more than one 'Linux' computer, how hard is it to ?

getent passwd | awk -F: '$3 > 499 && $3 < 10000 { print }' | grep -v '\
$' > /root/passwd.txt
getent shadow | awk -F: '$3 > 499 && $3 < 10000 { print }' | grep -v '\
$' > /root/shadow.txt
getent group | awk -F: '$3 > 499 && $3 < 10000 { print }' | grep -v '\
$' > /root/group.txt

copy these 3 files to the other 'Linux' machines and then simply cat
them onto the existing passwd/shadow/group files...

cat passwd.txt >> /etc/passwd
cat shadow.txt >> /etc/shadow
cat group.txt >> /etc/group

and then the UID mappings, GID mappings and passwords are all the same.

that would make user mounting of NFS quite simple

that would assure that user privileges are preserved as Unix/Linux
attributes where as with sambafs mounts, they are not.
----
> 
> > The point was however, Gene has stated emphatically that he has never
> > owned a Windows system but he uses Windows networking protocols to
> > create network connections on his home network. That is indicative of
> > many people who believe that they are 'MS Free' but still, perhaps
> > unwittingly, embrace Windows technology.
> 
> Well, we're slaves of ourselves, and slaves of technology :-)
> However, Samba is free and is good enough to be considered, I think.
----
yes it is free, they are also Microsoft protocols (smb and cifs) and
support for Unix attributes is not existent.

Curiously enough - Microsoft freely offers SFU - services for Unix -
free as in beer - I have situations where I make Windows Server speak
NFS instead of Linux systems speak smbfs. Different strokes for
different folks.
----
> 
> > We are less MS Free than we think we are.
> 
> Freedom, much like security, is a process. We're trying the best we can 
> and, speaking by myself self, I'm feeling more free everyday.
----
our perception of freedom is a philosophical debate

out perception of freedom from Microsoft products (fairly easy to do)
and File formats / patented & copyrighted technology (fairly difficult
to do) tends to stop at freedom from Microsoft shrink wrapped products
but that is only part of the equation.

Craig