FC3 on Dell PowerEdge 2800 and embedded SCSI and 10/100/1000NICs ?

[Thomas Cameron]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christofer C. Bell" <christofer.c.bell at gmail.com>
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: FC3 on Dell PowerEdge 2800 and embedded SCSI and 
10/100/1000NICs ?


> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:09:15 -0600, Thomas Cameron
> <thomas.cameron at camerontech.com> wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "McGuffey, David" <DAVID.C.MCGUFFEY at saic.com>
>> >
>> > Anyone running FC3 on this fairly generic box?  Any problems?  Any
>> > recommendations for a better box at the same or less cost?
>>
>> An observation:  posting multiple questions in a single message tends to
>> turn folks like me off.  I've found that I am more likely to answer a 
>> single
>> question...  So if you have three issues you are dealing with, I suggest
>> posting three messages.
>>
>> I could be wrong tho...
>
> So you are seriously suggesting that David post separate messages for
> the following questions?
>
> o Any trouble running FC3 on this fairly generic box?
> o Any problems (running FC3 on this fairly generic box)?[1]
> o Any recommendations for a better box at the same or less cost?
>
> You honestly believe these  questions are unrelated enough to warrant
> three separate posts?  Heck, I've just asked you the same question
> twice, perhaps I should have broken it into two posts.

No, no - I meant that asking about openwall, grsecurity, PAX, LIDS, and 
Bastille might be best done one post per topic (i.e. an openwall post, a 
gesecurity post, a PAX post and a LIDS post).  This assumes that the OP is 
asking about technical questions about each topic.  A question like "hey, do 
you like SELinux or Bastille better?" would probably be a logical singel 
post, but "how do I configure Bastille" and "how do I configure SELinux" 
would be better as separate questions.

Make sense?

TC