Ian's critrics on my former reply (was: top posting, HTML posting and "the closer")

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Do, den 31.03.2005 schrieb Ian McKinnon um 3:05:

> At the point you had to interject, you did not know if I meant, production
> servers, test servers or the server who brought me my lunch today.  Just
> which one of the forty odd servers we have here did you mean?  The fault of
> this was clearly yours in your assumptions and acting about it, please debug
> yourself.

Well, you then may ask questions which are not that vague from your
point of view? Anyway, I gave you an answer to your question, saying
that there is no such upgrade path you wish to hear and that you
probably don't get the kind of FC4 system when upgrading from a test
release like you would by doing a fresh install. (Besides the fact that
a test release is nothing stable.) I think that fits for all kinds of
servers.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.771_FC2smp 
Serendipity 03:27:01 up 1 day, 53 users, load average: 0.37, 0.46, 0.50 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050331/f682ed1b/attachment-0001.sig>