Failing drive?

Alexander Dalloz ad+lists at uni-x.org
Sat May 28 18:07:27 UTC 2005


Am Sa, den 28.05.2005 schrieb Ashley M. Kirchner um 19:49:

>     ...in fact, I have a brand new drive that just went in, and it shows 
> pre-fails in its report.  Manufactor date on the drive says Apr. 2005.  
> Explain those pre-fails to me.

Hm, according to "man 8 smartctl" I wasn't correct and a Pre-fail entry
isn't bad as long as the normalized value isn't less or equal to the
threshold. So reviewing your selftest output none of the Pre-fail or
Old_age registers seem to indicate a reason for sorrows.

Maybe see too: http://aplawrence.com/Words/2005_01_23.html

Alexander
 

-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.27_FC2smp 
Serendipity 20:03:11 up 4 days, 18:40, load average: 0.07, 0.08, 0.09 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050528/635c5861/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list