OOo 2.0 and Sun Java 1.5?

G Rajesh ganesanrajesh at gmail.com
Fri Nov 4 15:39:22 UTC 2005


Hi,
I found the following file 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171692 from fedora 
people website https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171692 
which seems to suggest a work around for this problem
Regards,
Rajesh

Tarjei Knapstad wrote:

> On 11/3/05, Charles Curley <charlescurley at charlescurley.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:28:46PM +0100, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
>> > On 11/3/05, Ian Pilcher <i.pilcher at comcast.net> wrote:
>> > > Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
>> > > > Sounds like it might be an OOo problem then, I find it pretty
>> > > > annoying that the OOo documentation doesn't specify what you're
>> > > > supposed to point to when adding a JRE...
>> > >
>> > > I'm pretty sure that the Fedora version of OO.o is patched to work
>> > > with
>> > > the GNU runtime.  This may make it incompatible with other JVM's.
>> > >
>> > > You might try removing the Fedora packages and downloading the
>> > > upstream version.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Ah, I see. Thanks.
>> >
>> > According to Charles Curley it doesn't work if you install the
>> > upstream RPM's from OOo either though, so it might be something
>> > else...
>>
>> What I tried and which did not work was finding the jpackage (fc4
>> native) JRE with the upstream OOo RPMs.
>>
>> Indeed, on my laptop I have the upstream OOo RPMs and Sun's
>> jdk-1.5.0_01-fcs RPM, and the upstream OOo finds the JRE. So Ian is
>> correct.
>>
> 
> OK, thanks for the info Charles!
> 
> --
> Tarjei
> 




More information about the fedora-list mailing list