Custom rules for spamassasin?
Craig McLean
craig at fukka.co.uk
Sun Nov 13 18:50:06 UTC 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Fully agreed. Better rejecting the forgery at SMTP time than to first
> accept it and then classify it as spam.
[snip]
> Hints for some reading:
>
> 1) http://www.cs.niu.edu/~rickert/cf/bad-ehlo.html
> [ http://www.cs.niu.edu/~rickert/cf/hack/block_bad_helo.m4 ]
Yep, that's what I'm running here. Though it was a long time ago I put
that hack in, so I forgot where it lived.
C.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDd4reMDDagS2VwJ4RAs/HAKCHl4OK9x2ChQXeE9mBsAzAT4CLYgCghWQR
PMTjlPemb1OaenldL1Ygzuk=
=DyHI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list