system-config-users 1.2.39 broken?

[valentin antonescu]

>On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:59:42AM +0800, "國產
>Wei-Yee Chan (Made in 
>Chinar)" wrote:
>> What exactly do U mean by "real work"?  U don't
mean >to say that 
>Windoze
>> users or people working in industries other than
>yours are slackers, 
>do
>> U? ;-)

=Ooh, no! That wasn't my intention. From this you can
infer that the few java developers we have here still
working under windoze are slackers too. And I know
they aren't. :) Anyway, I was talking here about my
field without any attempt to generalize.  

>> 
>> To be fair to everyone, I'd have to say that as far
>as I know, 
>Windoze
>> can pretty much do what Linux is capable of doing. 
I >don't know much
>> about your industry though, so I would have to
>reserve comment in 
>your case.
>> 
>You have to stop saying things like this. They are
>simply not true.
>If you want to say Windows is easier for people who
>aren't very
>sophisticated in computer use , OK. But as far as
doing >much of what
>Linux is capable of doing, that is just plain
>Balderdash.
--
= I really don't know what's Balderdash but I do know
that most of our work can be described as building
sophisticated pipelines and changing them as fast as
possible according to our research goals. We are
heavily relying on scripting capabilities any unix
system can provide. You don't have this under windows.
You also don't have the same reliability. I hope this
will give you a few hits for why we are not using
windows.

 regards,
 Val






		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com