Weird RPM/YUM problem.

Gilboa Davara gilboada at netvision.net.il
Wed Oct 19 16:41:19 UTC 2005


Forgot to add:

Intel P4 3,06Ghz , Hyper-threading enabled.
1GB DDR400.
80GB SATA.
Intel i865 chipset.
Fedora Core 3.
2.6.12-1.1378_FC3smp

Gilbo


On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 18:37 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> Hell all,
> 
> I'm trying upgrade my machine FC3 to kde-redhat's KDE 3.4.3 using yum.
> Once yum finishes download the files, I get BAD GPG signature error in
> one of the file.
> 
> So far, so good. I asked Rex (kde-redhat's maintainer) to check the
> files, and the files seem to be just fine.
> I cleared the yum cache and redownloaded the files. Same error (on
> different files, though.)
> I decided to check each and every file and did the following:
> 
> [root at gilboa-work-dev packages]# rpm -K *.rpm > check.1
> [root at gilboa-work-dev packages]# rpm -K *.rpm > check.2
> [root at gilboa-work-dev packages]# rpm -K *.rpm > check.3
> [root at gilboa-work-dev packages]# diff3 check.1 check.2 check.3 
> ====1
> 1:11c
>   kdebase-3.4.3-1.0.fc3.kde.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 GPG NOT OK
> 2:11c
> 3:11c
>   kdebase-3.4.3-1.0.fc3.kde.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK
> ====1
> 1:18c
>   kdelibs-3.4.3-1.0.fc3.kde.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 GPG NOT OK
> 2:18c
> 3:18c
>   kdelibs-3.4.3-1.0.fc3.kde.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK
> ====
> 1:30,31c
>   kdevelop-3.2.3-1.0.fc3.kde.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 GPG NOT OK
>   openoffice.org-1.1.5-0.1.fc3.kde.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 GPG NOT
> OK
> 2:30,31c
>   kdevelop-3.2.3-1.0.fc3.kde.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK
>   openoffice.org-1.1.5-0.1.fc3.kde.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 GPG NOT
> OK
> 3:30,31c
>   kdevelop-3.2.3-1.0.fc3.kde.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 GPG NOT OK
>   openoffice.org-1.1.5-0.1.fc3.kde.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK
> 
> As you see, each time I run rpm -K (AKA --checksig) I get a different
> result.
> This leads me to believe that the machine is flaking on me.
> However, beside this weird yum problem, the machine is perfectly
> stable. 
> 
> Any ideas?
> Gilboa
> 




More information about the fedora-list mailing list