Backup Email Server [OT]

[Andy Pieters]

Hi

> I recommend against it.  Unless you find a provider willing to set up a
> virtual domain, and allow you to update it with a database of your
> users, backup MX servers generate a TON of backscatter these days.
> They're not worth putting up, at all.  If your server is down or on
> overload, remote servers will queue and resend messages for a fairly
> long period.  In most situations it's better to rely on that than set up
> a backup MX.

Thanks I got the same suggestion from someone else.

With kind regards



Andy

-- 
Registered Linux User Number 379093
Now listening to Gompie - Who The X Is Alice

   amaroK::the Coolest Media Player in the known Universe!


   Cockroaches and socialites are the only things that can 
   stay up all night and eat anything.
					    Herb Caen
--
-- --BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GAT/O/>E$ d-(---)>+ s:(+)>: a--(-)>? C++++$(+++) UL++++>++++$ P-(+)>++
L+++>++++$ E---(-)@ W+++>+++$ !N@ o? !K? W--(---) !O !M- V-- PS++(+++)
PE--(-) Y+ PGP++(+++) t+(++) 5-- X++ R*(+)@ !tv b-() DI(+) D+(+++) G(+)
e>++++$@ h++(*) r-->++ y--()>++++
-- ---END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
--
Check out these few php utilities that I released
 under the GPL2 and that are meant for use with a 
 php cli binary:
 
 http://www.vlaamse-kern.com/sas/

--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051019/bc2096af/attachment-0001.sig>