amarok 1.3.5 and mysql???

[Andy Pieters]

Hi

While I admit packages are better to maintain, there is some truth in the 
words of Michial Peters.  

A bug should be filed.  Bug does not necessarly mean "defect" but can also 
mean "missing".  And in this case the package amaroK without MySql is 
certainly missing.

When compiling (...) it is as easy as configure --without-mysql but if 
packaged then the packager should make a package with MySQL and WITHOUT 
MySQL, even more so that MySQL support for amaroK is new (not taling about 
Beta versions)

With kind regards


Andy

On Saturday 29 October 2005 16:16, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Michael Peters wrote:
> > The MySQL dependency sounds to me like a packaging mistake, a bug should
> > be filed IMHO.
>
> Nope, just that amarok is built with support for a mysql backend, and
> that support requires mysql.  (And, AFAIK unfortunately, there's no easy
> way to separate it out for those who don't want it).
>
> -- Rex

-- 
Now listening to Top! Radio Live www.topradio.be/stream on amaroK
Geek code: www.vlaamse-kern.com/geek
Registered Linux User No 379093
If life was for sale, what would be its price?
www.vlaamse-kern.com/sas/ for free php utilities
--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051029/248fc530/attachment-0001.sig>