amarok 1.3.5 and mysql???

[oleksandr korneta]

on 10/29/2005 10:51 AM Andy Pieters wrote:
> Hi
> 
> While I admit packages are better to maintain, there is some truth in the 
> words of Michial Peters.  
> 
> A bug should be filed.  Bug does not necessarly mean "defect" but can also 
> mean "missing".  And in this case the package amaroK without MySql is 
> certainly missing.
strongly agree. I miss it very much


> 
> When compiling (...) it is as easy as configure --without-mysql but if 
> packaged then the packager should make a package with MySQL and WITHOUT 
> MySQL, even more so that MySQL support for amaroK is new (not taling about 
> Beta versions)

exactly!

> 
> With kind regards
> 
> 
> Andy
> 
> On Saturday 29 October 2005 16:16, Rex Dieter wrote:
> 
>>Michael Peters wrote:
>>
>>>The MySQL dependency sounds to me like a packaging mistake, a bug should
>>>be filed IMHO.
>>
>>Nope, just that amarok is built with support for a mysql backend, and
>>that support requires mysql.  (And, AFAIK unfortunately, there's no easy
>>way to separate it out for those who don't want it).
>>
>>-- Rex
> 
> 

-- 
regards,
Oleksandr Korneta