xntpd sendto (possible hack?)

Lovell Mcilwain lovell.mcilwain at gmail.com
Thu Sep 8 13:56:26 UTC 2005



Paul Howarth wrote:

> Lovell Mcilwain wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I just installed a logwatch on my machine and ran it for the first 
>> time just a few minutes ago.  It showed me something very interesting 
>> and it was the only thing in the logwatch log.  Just a bunch of the 
>> same entries.  The IP address varied but most of them looked like 
>> invalid arguments except for about 3 of them that didn't.  See below:
>>
>> --------------------- XNTPD Begin ------------------------
>> **Unmatched Entries**
>> .....
>> sendto(80.190.233.67): Invalid argument
>> synchronized to 80.190.233.67, stratum 2
>> synchronized to 80.33.117.152, stratum 3
>> sendto(80.190.233.67): Invalid argument
>> .....
>> ---------------------- XNTPD End -----------------------
>>
>> Does anyone know what this means or can this possibly mean that my 
>> system has been hacked?
>
>
> These entries mean that some of the ntp servers you're using (probably 
> results returned from lookups of pool.ntp.org) aren't responding 
> reliably. This is not unusual and may be a result of issues with your 
> own network link.
>
> Paul.
>
I did check my preferences for my time server and found that I didn't 
have a time server specified even though I had ntp enabled.  I guess my 
other question is, if I don't manually specify one, does it choose from 
any of the other ones as a default?  I noticed in my ntp.conf file there 
a bunch of time servers listed.  But does it restrict itself to the # 
--- OUR TIMESERVERS ----- section?




More information about the fedora-list mailing list