X.org's DRI vs. ATi's Proprietary driver (Was: "Re: ATI Livna driver package (Something has changed)")
Strong
s-strong at mail.ru
Wed Sep 21 07:03:28 UTC 2005
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 09:17 -0400, Claude Jones wrote:
> the video performance is visibly better on some of the more complex
> screen savers with the ATI-fglrx driver then with the one built in to
> the
> kernel.
Does anybody know, Why nvidia 3D-graphics support is excluded from the
default kernel, as opposed to ATI-ones?
--
Best regards,
Strong.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list