SElinux

[Rahul Sundaram]

On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 13:20 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 10:04, Craig White wrote:
> 
> > As for SELinux making a system 'unstable' - I can't envision a scenario
> > that SELinux would do that. 
> 
> Frequency of updates is a good metric for stability.  How many
> SELinux updates have been issued since it was experimentally
> included in fedora?

FC2 had strict policy disabled by default. FC3 targeted policy had a
dozen or so daemons. FC4 had 91. FC5 has a whole new reference policy
and other changes and there has been a steady inflow of policy updates
in every release. 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/FC5Features

Rahul