SElinux

[Antonio Olivares]

--- Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 13:20 -0500, Les Mikesell
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 10:04, Craig White wrote:
> > 
> > > As for SELinux making a system 'unstable' - I
> can't envision a scenario
> > > that SELinux would do that. 
> > 
> > Frequency of updates is a good metric for
> stability.  How many
> > SELinux updates have been issued since it was
> experimentally
> > included in fedora?
> 
> FC2 had strict policy disabled by default. FC3
> targeted policy had a
> dozen or so daemons. FC4 had 91. FC5 has a whole new
> reference policy
> and other changes and there has been a steady inflow
> of policy updates
> in every release. 
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/FC5Features
> 
> Rahul
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 

 When it comes to SELinux, Fedora/RedHat lead the way,
in the other post, I mentioned SUSE also because I
read that they were incorporating it into their
distro.  Their efforts are not as strong as Fedora's
as this from 

http://selinux.sourceforge.net/devel/kernel.php3

states that other distros that want to incorporate
SELinux into their work it is

As noted on the Userland Packages page, there are a
number of userspace packages with patches for SELinux
in order to leverage the SELinux kernel features.
These patches must be ported to the packages included
in a new distribution. When porting to a new
distribution, it is likely best to port the latest
SELinux patches from the Fedora Core development tree,
as it has the most complete and up-to-date set of
SELinux patches presently. 

http://selinux.sourceforge.net/distros/others.php3

Regards,

Antonio

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com