Missing dependency libpisock.so.8 for evolution

The_Eye_in_The_Sky syiwabhairawa at yahoo.com.sg
Wed Apr 19 00:07:12 UTC 2006


Erik Hemdal wrote:
> Software Updater fails to apply updates on my system because an update
> for evolution requires libpisock.so.8.  Same thing happens with a
> conventional 'yum update' -- the dependency check fails.
> 
> My system has libpisock.so.9 installed with the pilot-link package.
> It's a fresh install of FC5.  This is only the second yum update I have
> run on the machine.  So that explains why the dependency is missing, but
> not how it came about.  Is this due to a conflict between evolution and
> pilot-link; a user error; or a packaging problem somewhere along the
> line?
> 
> Can't find anything in the recent list postings, which is why I'm
> posting.  Anyone else see this?

I do have the same problem. First I thought I was using the atrpms repo 
too much, but when I got another freshly installed and updated using 
Fedora repo and livna, I got the same problem
Send instant messages to your online friends http://asia.messenger.yahoo.com 




More information about the fedora-list mailing list