Mozilla Suite vs. Firefox

[Jim Cornette]

Kam Leo wrote:
> On 4/29/06, Jim Cornette <fc-cornette at insight.rr.com> wrote:
>> Dan wrote:
>> > Mike Chalmers wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> I was wondering what the differences are between the Mozilla Suite web
>> >> browser and Firefox?
>> >>
>> >> From,
>> >> Mike
>> >>
>> > Well the Mozilla Suite is becoming obsolete in favor of Seamonkey 
>> (which
>> > is essentially the same thing, but more mainstream-intended, as Firefox
>> > was to Mozilla originally).
>> > For the basics:
>> > Mozilla/Seamonkey loads faster (by a large margin).
>> > Firefox is used by far more people and thus has far more support,
>> > extensions, and themes, etc.
>> > Mozilla/Seamonkey is an all-in-one browser/email/website composer 
>> package.
>> > Firefox is simply a browser.
>> > HTH
>> > -Dan
>> >
>>
>> Seamonkey has a lot better spell checking capabilities and uses the same
>> profiles as mozilla/netscape. I use the seamonkey suite and am waiting
>> for rpms for the suite to make it to make it to extras. Mozilla will
>> soon be removed from core. Seamonkey will soon be in Extras.
> 
> It is already in Extras.

I'm installing it but it was not in extras but is located in extras 
development. It says fc6 on the distro tag used for the rpms.

Jim
> 
>>
>> Jim
>>
> 


-- 
Nondeterminism means never having to say you are wrong.