bugzilla life cycle
Don Russell
fedora at drussell.dnsalias.com
Thu Aug 3 15:59:39 UTC 2006
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:59:07AM -0700, Don Russell wrote:
>
>> Is there a typical time frame from when a bug is closed/fixed in
>> bugzilla, and the correction distributed via yum update?
>>
>
> Nope.
>
>
>> In particular, I'm curious about a bug I opened against ftp, and
>> provided a fix for...
>> If interested, see
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196103
>>
>
> This was closed as CURRENTRELEASE, but it appears the RH engineer chose that
> by mistake -- it's actually fixed in the development tree, not an update to
> the current release, so either NEXTRELEASE or RAWHIDE would have been
> correct.
>
> I'm going to go ahead and change the resolution to RAWHIDE. However, if you
> believe this is an issue which really deserves an FC5 errata, you should
> reopen with a comment to that effect.
Thanks.... I reopened it asking if it could be released as an FC5
update.... it's not critical to me at this point, I've already worked
around the issue with another solution. But, since there are no special
requirements/dependencies for this fix, I don't see why it should wait
until FC6 before being distributed. I don't necessarily expect it to be
retrofitted to FC4,3,2 etc, but FC5 is "current" and I'd rather see
fixes sooner than later. :-)
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list