gcc 3.4.X for FC5 ?

[Chris Jones]

> is it safe to install these on an FC5 system - Will they trounce over the
> default gcc (4.1.1) ?

Think I've answered this myself

jonesc at localhost /data/download > rpm -qlp gcc-c++-3.4.5-2.i386.rpm
warning: gcc-c++-3.4.5-2.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 
443e1821
/usr/bin/c++
/usr/bin/c++filt
/usr/bin/g++
/usr/bin/i386-redhat-linux-c++
/usr/bin/i386-redhat-linux-g++
/usr/lib/gcc
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.3
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.5
/usr/libexec/gcc
/usr/libexec/gcc/i386-redhat-linux
/usr/libexec/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.3
/usr/libexec/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.3/cc1plus
/usr/libexec/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.5
/usr/share/doc/gcc-c++-3.4.5
/usr/share/doc/gcc-c++-3.4.5/ChangeLog
/usr/share/doc/gcc-c++-3.4.5/ChangeLog.1
/usr/share/doc/gcc-c++-3.4.5/ChangeLog.2
/usr/share/doc/gcc-c++-3.4.5/ChangeLog.3
/usr/share/doc/gcc-c++-3.4.5/ChangeLog.egcs
/usr/share/man/man1/g++.1.gz

so not a good idea to install (probably will fail), unless I remove my current 
default gcc 4.1.1 first, which I don't want to do.

Think I'll stick with a private source build into a custom location. Seems 
safer.

Chris