Monitor destroyed by install

Roger Heflin rheflin at atipa.com
Tue Dec 12 21:01:49 UTC 2006


ols6000 at sbcglobal.net wrote:
> At 11:09 PM 12/11/2006, you wrote:
>> We're back at the original list of likely scenarios:
>>
>> Physical failure of the plug and socket.  Technical failure of the input
>> stage for various reasons unrelated to input frequency (such as a fault
>> caused from the video card it was connected to, the input stage being
>> zapped while connecting up, spurious failure).
> 
> Plug and socket on the video card work with a different monitor.
> The DVI input stage on the monitor *does* work, if you trick the 
> computer into thinking the DVI is active.
> 
>> It's more than likely that it's your computer hardware that killed it,
>> than the software that's on it.
> 
> The hardware is under control of the sw.
> 
>> Don't argue with an electronics engineer (i.e. myself) about diagnosing
>> technical faults, unless you happen to be one, too.
> 
> FYI, I spend most of my time dx tech faults. Let me suggest that you do 
> not attempt to "argue by authority" (i e, you should believe me because 
> I'm an EE), but instead provide some useful suggestions.
> 
>> Likewise, don't bite off the heads of other software people on the 
>> list who might just know more than you do.
> 
> So far, out of all the e-mails on this subject, I have not received one 
> useful piece of information, nor has anyone acknowledged that there just 
> might be something wrong with the sw.
> 
> As a consequence, I am unsubscribing from the list.

See if the monitor is in auto mode, I have seen several monitors
in auto mode (dvi/vga15) not properly pick up which connection
is being used fast enough and/or make the computer think that
there is no monitor there, and it fails upon boot up on the
monitor.

                                Roger




More information about the fedora-list mailing list