Blocking Spam

Florin Andrei florin at andrei.myip.org
Thu Dec 28 08:45:54 UTC 2006


jdow wrote:

> Wull, my take on amavisd is that is its own punishment. Configuring it
> to something akin to the way I have procmail working is a royal pain
> in the <sitapon part.>

I agree it's not for everyone. But for the average sysadmin should be 
easy enough.

It's not even close to the difficulty of sendmail.cf or a typical 
procmail config, mostly because it's self-explanatory, full of comments, 
and the implicit values for most variables are fine in most cases.

Finally, let's not mislead the uninitiated bystanders that amavisd is a 
procmail replacement. The two are rather different in purpose.

> I see way more problems on the SA list with
> amavisd, mailscanner, or things like that than I do with procmail. But
> then everybody seems to be scared off from procmail. Maybe that's why.

The problem with procmail (and with spamc by the way) is that you're 
running a new process (sometimes several) for each new message. This is 
fine for a low-profile server, but it gets overwhelming pretty quick 
when the traffic goes up.
amavisd is a service that runs continuously and it scales pretty well 
with traffic. Just increase the number of child daemons if need be.

-- 
Florin Andrei

http://florin.myip.org/




More information about the fedora-list mailing list