Installing unsigned packages with yum
Anne Wilson
cannewilson at tiscali.co.uk
Sat Dec 30 19:28:02 UTC 2006
On Saturday 30 December 2006 18:43, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
> >> If you've manually downloaded it, and the one package can be installed
> >> without any worries about sorting out dependencies, you might as well
> >> use rpm. Using the yum command isn't gaining you anything.
>
> Anne Wilson:
> > Fair enough. I'm always a bit reluctant to mix methods
>
> That really isn't a case of mixing methods. When you use YUM, it uses
> the RPM database to help with determining dependencies, at *that* time.
> Next time you use YUM, it works on the current condition of the RPM
> database, which would have been updated if your installed something
> using RPM. YUM is just acting as an agent to play with RPM.
>
That's reassuring. I wasn't sure whether yum would actually know about the
rpm installed in this way - I thought it would, but there was just the
possibility that rpm didn't write in the way that yum expects - IYSWIM :-)
Anne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20061230/be557370/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list